The Power of Distinct Sounds
I recently read Laura Wattenberg's post on Namerology about how the name predictions she made over fifteen years ago compared to actual trends. At the end of the post, she recommends including distinct-sounding names when making predictions.
I never thought much about distinct sounds, expect as a preference among some parents, but I can see why they have more staying power than mix-and-match names like Paisley and Grayson (neither of which seem headed towards the top 20). When parents hear names ending in "-ley" and "-son" all the time, they might tire of the sound and, hence, gravitate towards more unique choices.
Below, I have listed every new top 100 entry from the 2010s that has remained there since, and I bolded and colored the distinct names:
GIRLS' NAMES:
- Naomi
- Stella
- Lucy
- Ellie
- Lydia
- Scarlett
- Harper
- Aria
- Violet
- Ruby
- Nora
- Paisley
- Mila
- Penelope
- Sadie
- Alice
- Eleanor
- Quinn
- Cora
- Aurora
- Hazel
- Willow
- Elena
- Eliana
- Kinsley
- Luna
- Adeline
- Nova
- Valentina
- Everly
- Emilia
- Delilah
- Emery
- Josephine
- Ivy
- Isla
BOYS' NAMES:
- Jaxon
- Grayson
- Nolan
- Easton
- Hudson
- Lincoln
- Leo
- Asher
- Elias
- Theodore
- Ezra
- Mateo
- Roman
- Leonardo
- Santiago
- Maverick
- Ezekiel
- Miles
- Everett
- Axel
- Kai
- Wesley
- Luca
As illustrated above, half of all the girls' entries from the 2010s have distinct sounds; the same is true for nine of twenty-three boys' names. Besides, many of the highest-rising names, including Luna, Eleanor, Asher, and Theodore, lack both rhymes and alternate spellings.
A sound that blends into the crowd does not disqualify a name for success, but distinctiveness helps it continue to stand out even as it gets more popular; parents are less likely to tire of it.
Do you think name distinctiveness has power?
Comments
Post a Comment